"A degree of caution, neither justified nor required...."
What worries me is that not only wasn't I believed at the time, but that it isn't happening now? It is.
That Savile was the *most* prolific offender? No - he was the most prolific DISCOVERED offender.
How naive. It is going on now? Say it isn't and history will prove you wrong I am so confident.
Savile - a watershed? Hardly - I suggest it's the norm (how often, frequently does this abuse occur)?
Adults abuse children naturally? Fact?
Fact. Just look how common it is.
What should we do now about those most likely to be offenders in the same position - that is those who are suspected but we dare not name for worry of being sued, maligned - accused of being an internet troll?
The most paedophile.
Can I give you my list now? If only to suggest who I feel about now, in the same way Jim Fixed It for me?
Name and shame? Give us an assurance of immunity to alert to those who should be notified.
So, give me guidance. Savile was so obvioulsy red alert.
As for those who currently have the same creepiness as Savile - should we wait until their offences are discovered, or alert to them now and strike pre-emptively?